
Little Women by Louisa May Alcott
As young readers like to know ‘how people look’, we will take this moment to give them a little sketch of the four sisters, who sat knitting away in the twilight. It was a comfortable old room, though the carpet was faded and the furniture very plain; for a good picture or two hung on the walls, books filled the recesses, chrysanthemums and Christmas roses bloomed in the windows, and a pleasant atmosphere of home-peace pervaded it.
Margaret, the eldest of the four, was sixteen, and very pretty, being plump and fair, with large eyes, plenty of soft, brown hair, a sweet mouth, and white hands, of which she was rather vain. Fifteen-year-old Jo was very tall, thin, and brown, and reminded one of a colt; for she never seemed to know what to do with her long limbs, which were very in her way. She had a decided mouth, a comical nose, and sharp, grey eyes, which appeared to see everything, and were by turns fierce, funny, or thoughtful. Her long, thick hair was her one beauty; but it was usually bundled in a net, to be out for her way. Round shoulders had Jo, big hands and feet, a fly-away look to her clothes, and the uncomfortable appearance of a girl who was rapidly shooting up into a woman, and didn’t like it. Elizabeth—or Beth, as everyone called her—was a rosy, smooth-haired, bright-eyed girl of thirteen, with a shy manner, a timid voice, and a peaceful expression, which was seldom disturbed. Her father called her ‘Little Tranquility’, and the name suited her excellently; for she seemed to live in a happy world of her own, only venturing out to meet the few whom she trusted and loved. Amy, thought the youngest, was a most important person—in her own opinion at least. A regular snow-maiden, with blue eyes, and yellow hair, curling on her shoulders, pale and slender, and always carrying herself like a young lady mindful of her manner. What the characters of the four sisters were, will leave to be found out.
Louisa May Alcott remained a sturdy independent literary spinster, and so should Jo have done. In fact, that is what Alcott herself said, in a letter to her friend Alf Whitman. “Jo should have remained a literary spinster, but so many enthusiastic young ladies wrote to me clamorously demanding that she marry Laurie or somebody, that I didn’t dare refuse, but out of perversity went and made a funny match for her.”
Everyone’s marriage was a little bloodless. I said it, shoot me NOW!

I very much enjoy 19th century novels and was curious about this classic. Well, it was a mistake indeed—but not in the way that I expected! The book itself was a joy to read, engaging and engrossing and wonderful; but man oh man, never, ever have I experienced such disappointment at two literary characters not ending up together. The chapter entitled “Heartache” left me as crushed as if I had been in Laurie’s place, and when I began to see a Laurie/Amy match beginning to take shape, man… it really bummed me out. The Bhaer stuff I could barely stomach.
So yeah, Team Laurie here.
(Damn you, Louisa May Alcott.)

I hate how Jo ended up with the professor and Laurie with Amy. I feel Louisa May Alcott was high or something and ran out of good ideas and just let it end so poorly.
This fate could have been avoided if Jo had a sassy gay friend.

